[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module
From:       Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-10-28 17:13:04
Message-ID: CAKF+bsqrKxNKv+S8tJpp21_r7t1HC98fOgoVJs8uesb919j2FQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Ok, I will remove only vertx for now then.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com> wrote:
> The AeroGear Connector Service is a useful component, if it's not working
> then let's fix it up.  It's a convenient way for users to integrate
> traditional messaging systems with mobile applications.
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Francesco Nigro <nigro.fra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Good idea!
>>
>> Il ven 28 ott 2016, 15:37 Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> > On 28 October 2016 at 05:56, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I
>> > > don't really think anyone will be using it:
>> > >
>> > > - aerogear:
>> > >     * It's not working
>> > >     * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear
>> > >     * It's probably better to be integrated the other way around. i.e.
>> > > Aerogear consuming artemis
>> > > - vertx
>> > >    * There are other ways to integrate with vertx. the most obvious is
>> > > through the AMQP bridge. also you could create VertX components in
>> > > Vertx which is more component oriented than a message broker.
>> > >    * It's broken as well, even using a very old version.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I will remove these two modules and its tests before the release
>> > > (which I'm still trying to get it out asap.. I just keep looking for
>> > > issues, given my OCD level :) ).. we can always revert from git later
>> > > if we get any real users (I really doubt that).. and then it should be
>> > > proper fixed if anyone is using it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Any objections?
>> >
>> > Seems like a good idea to me.
>> >
>>



-- 
Clebert Suconic
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]