[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: HEADS-UP/DISCUSS Artemis 1.4.1
From:       "John D. Ament" <johndament () apache ! org>
Date:       2016-10-26 1:34:16
Message-ID: CAOqetn8=0x3zSib-LEpLJN7_U05yzApLXhKiuTnBVRyBpNYw1A () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


I won't have time to whip up the actual code tonight, maybe tomorrow.  If
someone else has some interest in implementing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-821 I added some notes on
where it looks like the header reading is missing.  Please take a look,
comment on how far off I might be.

John

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:06 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Just an update on the status.
>
> I am a bit late (at least on what I pleanned) for this release as
> there are a few issues I wanted to get as part of 1.5.0.
>
> I have 2 JIRAs now as blocker for 1.5.0, meaning I will release when I
> clear the blockers. If there's also something you think it must/should
> come on 1.5.0 please let me know now.
>
>
> so far I have:
>
> Support scheduled messages with the STOMP protocol -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-821
> Reduce thread synchronization on the Journal -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-822
>
> I am currently working on ARTEMIS-822. I mean also create another
> blocker JIRA coming out of this work.
>
>
> If anyone could volunteer on ARTEMIS-821, it would be great :)
> Since I'm asking for help, if you start working on it.. please either
> add a comment or use Start Progress on the JIRA (to make sure we
> wouldn't have more than one person working on the same thing and
> wasting time)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Clebert
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Clebert Suconic
> <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I will just call it 1.5.0 to be on the safe side.. not more discussion
> needed :)
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Clebert Suconic
> > <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm looking at a git log between 1.4.0 and HEAD, and from what I see,
> >> there are a few improvements that could be translated as either
> >> features/improvements or bugs.
> >>
> >> A few tweaks on the wording could change them into either bug or fix...
> e.g:
> >>
> >> Reloading Divert Support - Feature,
> >> Diverts are not reloaded = Bug
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The only real feature I could find so far was your commit here:
> >>
> >>
> >> commit 9163c679ef21e70ba94f54c9a1bed9a12ad6bcca
> >> Author: John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> >> Date:   Sun Jul 31 22:12:50 2016 -0400
> >>     ARTEMIS-756 introduce CDI based integration for Artemis.  Includes
> >> integration tests on both Weld and OWB.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you'd like I can call it 1.5.0 based on this change. it's up to you
> >> really since it's your commit. WDYT?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:09 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> Is there a changelog of whats going in? If its all bug fixes, 1.4.1
> makes
> >>> sense.  if its feature, I would think 1.5.0 is more appropriate.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:52 AM Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I want to make a release early next week. (as I have pointed a few
> weeks
> >>>> ago).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I will release from master... there are a few new packages added
> >>>> around OSGI, but I was still considering calling 1.4.1, and reserve
> >>>> 1.5.0 for a few more major features that will change the broker
> >>>> itself.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If no objections I will call it 1.4.1, but I wouldn't mind calling it
> >>>> 1.5.0 if anyone objects.
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]