[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: activemq-dev
Subject: Re: Contributing to the Apache Docker Account
From: Victor <victor.romero () gmail ! com>
Date: 2016-08-31 5:10:58
Message-ID: CAMx9zvYpVCJXWgCU+SYnQtMWLywu=no=v71xSJ47hFn2KnPikQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi John,
> Ok, I think that's based on some outdated information.
You might be thinking of docker itself where it is perfectly possible.
In docker hub, the issue 292
<https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/292> is still open.
> There's still some discussions on going on other mailing lists,
> but it looks like right now any concept of a snapshot docker
> container shouldn't be used. Meaning what you have right now
> will be perfect.
Great news!
As activemq-artemis only has a master branch (or at least that is what I
can see in github and git.apache.org) I'll only be able to PR for the *latest
*tag. It is not ideal but at least it is a start.
I'll have the PR ready soon.
2016-08-30 17:25 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>:
> Hi Victor,
>
> Ok, I think that's based on some outdated information. There's still some
> discussions on going on other mailing lists, but it looks like right now
> any concept of a snapshot docker container shouldn't be used. Meaning what
> you have right now will be perfect.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:40 PM Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > No, that is not possible as the rest of the sources are not available and
> > therefor the build cannot be done, i.e: cannot: ADD .. in a dockerfile
> >
> > 2016-08-30 7:27 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Victor,
> > >
> > > Right, what I was thinking is that both the readme and the dockerfile
> > live
> > > in a subdirectory. This way chroot works correctly.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:50 AM Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > No we can't, dockerhub will chroot to the directory where the
> > dockerfile
> > > is
> > > > in, the build would be impossible.
> > > >
> > > > The alternative, using the root folder, will leave us in a
> sub-standard
> > > > situation where the readme for the dockerhub page is the general
> > project
> > > > readme, just like https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/thrift/ .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2016-08-29 19:52 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Victor,
> > > > >
> > > > > So just wondering. From what I understand, docker simply pulls the
> > > > README
> > > > > from the current directory. Couldn't we create a docker
> subdirectory
> > > in
> > > > > the repo?
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:17 PM Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear devs,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm afraid I cannot create a good enough docker image as two
> > > > constraints
> > > > > > clash:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Cannot use a different repository (as per John's)
> > > > > > - Should have a proper docker specific README.md file in the
> docker
> > > hub
> > > > > > page (as per my personal preference).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This won't change unless, the issue 292
> > > > > > <https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/292> in docker
> hub
> > > gets
> > > > > > fixed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll keep an eye on the issue in case it gets fixed (feb 18 they
> > > wrote
> > > > > > <https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/292#
> > > > > issuecomment-185811039>:
> > > > > > *We
> > > > > > have a plan in place and will provide an update as soon as we
> > can*) ,
> > > > and
> > > > > > will keep maintaining my personal docker image.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-08-14 10:31 GMT-07:00 Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi John, devs
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I hear your expectations and I'm following option two, the
> > > > > > thrift/marmotta
> > > > > > > approach for that reason.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is some maintenance I'd like to happen to avoid ending up
> > > with
> > > > > > > images like thrift, that only has *latest
> > > > > > > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/thrift/tags/> *and not one
> tag
> > > per
> > > > > each
> > > > > > > version as I'd like it to have. I can update RELEASING.md
> > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/
> > > RELEASING.md
> > > > >
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the same PR with some very short instructions on how to change
> > the
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > > in the Dockerfile (very simple) on every release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The whole *latest is meant to be SNAPSHOT* is an open and
> broader
> > > > > > > discussion. But if the greater apache, as it seems, consider
> > latest
> > > > is
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > non repeatable SNAPSHOT build, I'm happy with it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2016-08-14 9:06 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hey Victor,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> To clarify. I'm expecting that a build of artemis results in
> > the
> > > > > > >> creation (and publishing) of a docker container. This
> container
> > > > > > represents
> > > > > > >> the underlying build artifact. This is known as the "latest"
> in
> > > > > docker.
> > > > > > >> When doing a release, i expect something similar.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The ASF only does automatic docker builds. Not manual. Based
> > on
> > > > > input
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > >> got from our infra, its never a separate repo, always in the
> > same
> > > > > repo.
> > > > > > >> Granted we don't have a ton of examples yet, but that seems to
> > be
> > > > the
> > > > > > go-to
> > > > > > >> (and realistically represents a true CI/CD pattern for
> > completely
> > > > > > running
> > > > > > >> apps like this).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The actual creation of the container is a separate step in
> > > jenkins.
> > > > > So
> > > > > > >> once the current dockerfile is donated, pointing to a
> different
> > > > > location
> > > > > > >> for the binary, I can carry out the steps w/ infra to setup
> the
> > > > docker
> > > > > > >> builds. There shouldn't be a reason to point to a remote
> > location
> > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >> binary as a result, it'll all be local to the workspace. I'll
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > >> need to setup some kind of job to build releases, but
> shouldn't
> > > be a
> > > > > big
> > > > > > >> issue.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> You can find a few examples out on our ASF hub page -
> > > > > > >> https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/. Thrift is the most curious
> > one
> > > > > from
> > > > > > >> my POV. It actually builds thrift on the image, and uses an
> > entry
> > > > > > point to
> > > > > > >> allow extension (e.g. execution of thrift).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Also apologies, I missed that this fell off the dev list.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> John
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 1:30 AM Victor <
> victor.romero@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Hi John,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> You mentioned building SNAPSHOTs and it sounds great to me.
> The
> > > > > problem
> > > > > > >>> is that one does not just curl the latest version of a
> > SNAPSHOT.
> > > > > There
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > >>> many rolling versions
> > > > > > >>> <
> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>> .
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Also SNAPSHOTs would generate an interesting scenario when
> > > > releasing
> > > > > > >>> versions, as the docker file for a snapshot would be
> different
> > > than
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> dockerfile of a RELEASE. Therefor, someone (I can do it if
> > > > necessary)
> > > > > > has
> > > > > > >>> to make sure the Dockerfile is updated accordingly by taking
> > the
> > > > > > dockerfile
> > > > > > >>> from the latest release version (or uncomment code perhaps).
> > > > Therefor
> > > > > > I'd
> > > > > > >>> discard the obvious workarounds (see below two examples):
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> - Curlling the maven metadata
> > > > > > >>> <
> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > > > > maven-metadata.xml
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>> of the SNAPSHOT, and with xmlstarlet extract the latest
> > > version.
> > > > > > >>> - Using the nexus api
> > > > > > >>> <
> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/artifact/maven/
> > > > > redirect?r=snapshots&g=org.apache.activemq&a=apache-
> artemis&v=LATEST
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>> (although I haven been able to make it work, but just
> spent
> > > > 10m).
> > > > > > Tied to
> > > > > > >>> an specific maven repo software. Unclear to me how to
> > validate
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Even if we forget about the SNAPSHOTS, there has to be a
> clear
> > > > > release
> > > > > > >>> mechanism if the dockerfile lives inside of the main repo.
> > > Because
> > > > it
> > > > > > does
> > > > > > >>> download releases versions from an external site (not from
> the
> > > > > > reactor) and
> > > > > > >>> validates against a manually given signature.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> The approaches I see are:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> 1. Non automatic dockerhub build. Build and upload to
> > > dockerhub
> > > > > > >>> using a maven plugin. Would ease maintenance. Users of
> > > dockerhub
> > > > > > prefer
> > > > > > >>> automatic builds, but overall it would be great experience
> > > both
> > > > > for
> > > > > > users
> > > > > > >>> and developers. Would probably make
> > > > > > >>> 2. Automatic dockerhub build that actually builds Artemis
> > in
> > > > > > >>> dockerhub (skipping tests). The image that is meant to be
> as
> > > > small
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > >>> possible, it will likely have some leftovers, probably not
> > to
> > > > many
> > > > > > if done
> > > > > > >>> carefully. This is the same approach marmotta
> > > > > > >>> <https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/
> Dockerfile
> > >
> > > > > uses.
> > > > > > >>> 3. Use a different repo just as it is right now and ignore
> > > > > > >>> SNAPSHOTS. Proven to work and I'd say 99% of the dockerhub
> > > > > projects
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > >>> like that.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> 3 is the current path but I'll discard it for one single
> > reason:
> > > no
> > > > > > >>> other apache project seems to follow it.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Personally I don't want to go through the 1 route, as it
> would
> > > > > require
> > > > > > >>> the apache dockerhub credentials to be store in the apache
> CI.
> > > And
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > sure
> > > > > > >>> someone, somewhere would have problems with that. Otherwise
> is
> > a
> > > > > > perfectly
> > > > > > >>> valid approach.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> So unless you have any other idea, I'd go for the option 2 as
> > > soon
> > > > > as I
> > > > > > >>> can.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> 2016-08-12 19:58 GMT-07:00 Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Hi John,
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Apologies I have just arrived back from a travel. I'll put
> it
> > > > > together
> > > > > > >>>> this very weekend and I'll let you know.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks for the help.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> 2016-08-12 18:56 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <
> > > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Hey Victor,
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Just wondering if you were able to get this together?
> > > > > Unfortunately,
> > > > > > >>>>> the ActiveMQ permissions don't let me assign to you.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> John
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:41 PM Victor <
> > > victor.romero@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Nice! Feel free to assign to me : "vromero".
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> 2016-07-29 15:10 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <
> > > > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Also, I created a ticket in JIRA for this:
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > > > >>>>>>> g/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-658
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> John
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:58 PM John D. Ament <
> > > > > > >>>>>>> john.d.ament@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Victor,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Basically, that's a working example of how ASF does
> docker
> > > > > builds.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> They setup an automated build per branch.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> John
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:37 PM Victor <
> > > > victor.romero@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi John,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you! Excellent stuff, I'll take care of it. BTW
> yes
> > > I'm
> > > > > in
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> dev@active.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The only thing I don't fully comprehend is the thrift
> > one.
> > > > How
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> does thrift applies here?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2016-07-29 13:29 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <
> > > > > john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I just dug around a bit on how we have docker
> setup.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Everything is an automated build, so we can have it
> > build
> > > > > based
> > > > > > on the code
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> in Artemis. I would recommend as a first step to
> raise
> > a
> > > PR
> > > > > to
> > > > > > contribute
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the dockerfile and entry point to the artemis repo. I
> > can
> > > > > > setup a build
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> then in docker hub to build our master.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Some minor changes:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Instead of downloading from the mirrors, download
> the
> > > > > artifact
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> from the repository, this way we can do 1.4 snapshots
> in
> > > > > > addition to the
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> released binaries.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - You may want to base it on thrift,
> > > https://github.com/apa
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> che/thrift
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Make sure ASF license headers are present.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> John
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:06 PM John D. Ament <
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> john.d.ament@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hey Victor,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Are you already subscribed on dev@activemq?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Basically from what I understand, we do automated
> > builds
> > > > into
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the docker hub. So we wouldn't directly bring in
> your
> > > > image,
> > > > > > but if you
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> have the source code we can implement it as a partof
> > our
> > > > > build.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> What do you use to build your docker container?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> John
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> From: John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:52 PM
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Contributing to the Apache Docker
> Account
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> To: Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com>, <
> > > > > dev@activemq.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But yes I'll take care of it
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2016 15:51, "John D. Ament" <
> > > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe that's an infra question
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2016 15:47, "Bruce Snyder" <
> > > > > bruce.snyder@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well so far nobody has responded. So I have no idea
> > who
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> controls it. We need to find out who controls
> access
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > ASF account at
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Docker Hub.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruce
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Victor <
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> victor.romero@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bruce,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any information would be highly appreciated.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-13 15:43 GMT-07:00 Bruce Snyder <
> > > > > bsnyder@apache.org
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John, can you help out Victor with his request to
> > > > > > contribute
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his image to the ASF account at Docker Hub? It
> > looks
> > > > like
> > > > > > you were the last
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one to respond to Victor's request who has
> > knowledge
> > > of
> > > > > > the ASF account at
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Docker Hub.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone else who can help Victor get his
> > > Docker
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> image contributed so that it can be listed under
> > the
> > > > ASF
> > > > > > account at Docker
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hub?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruce
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ted Husted <human-response@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:52 PM
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Contributing to the Apache Docker
> > > Account
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Victor <victor.romero@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: bsnyder@apache.org
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your inquiry.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Artemis is a subproject of ActiveMQ, the best
> > > person
> > > > > to
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact with this question is the ActiveMQ PMC
> > Chair.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe Bruce Snyder is the current PMC Chair.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may also wish to refer to the project's
> > > > Contributing
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://activemq.apache.org/contributing.html
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps, Ted Husted.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Member Emeritus, Apache Software Foundation.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * http://www.apache.org/foundation/preFAQ.html
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Victor <
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> victor.romero@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Apache,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since Sep 27, 2015 I have an Apache Artemis
> > docker
> > > > > image
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on docker hub
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/vromero/activemq-artemis/
> > > >
> > > > (>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 700 installations, 1 pull request, 1
> stackoverflow
> > > and
> > > > > no
> > > > > > complains).
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have already shared it with the Apache Artemis
> > > team
> > > > > and
> > > > > > it seems to be a
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common agreement (between the few that replied
> the
> > > > > thread
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-dev/
> > > > > 201604.mbox/%3CCAOqetn8FG_Yz+eqFXuE=oxD1hKjepBgOLqy63Eq3A22EPuNoOg
> > > > > @mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > >)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if contributed it should be in the Apache
> > > docker
> > > > > > user.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although there seems to be no specific Apache
> > > contact
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to Docker. That is why I'm writting you.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm specifically looking for someone to ask for
> > any
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific the process and artifacts that might be
> > > > > > required. I already signed
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contributors agreement, I'm looking for
> things
> > > > like
> > > > > > special
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, move it to a given repo, etc.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perl -e 'print unpack("u35",
> > > > > > "\@0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)S;GED9
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)\`87!A8VAE+F]R9PH\`");'
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic