[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()
From:       Justin Bertram <jbertram () apache ! com>
Date:       2016-05-16 18:25:46
Message-ID: 192067061.3280224.1463423146721.JavaMail.zimbra () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I guess I still don't understand the use-case.  Why exactly is it necessary to \
offload SSL?  Is it because there is concern that SSL is going to use too many \
resources?  If so, is there solid benchmark data to back that up?  If so, could you \
share it or provide steps to reproduce the results?


Justin

----- Original Message -----
From: "abhijith" <topcoderabhijith@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 12:23:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()

Sorry! I don't really follow.  Its a HA cluster where we always want client
to communicate to brokers via TLS.  Its not an issue for broker to broker
communication.  Its an issue when client tries to communicate with broker. 
I have followed replicated-failback-static example given
here(https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/master/examples/features/ha/replicated-failback-static)
 to create client connectors.



--
View this message in context: \
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Bug-in-ServerLocatorImpl-createSessionFactory-tp4711941p4712008.html
 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]