[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: Stomp & durable topics - implementation
From:       Sandeep Chayapathi <sandeep () wssource ! com>
Date:       2006-08-30 18:44:06
Message-ID: 44F5DC76.1020303 () wssource ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

  Thanks. I took a look @ the java code and I the problem seems to be a 
simple typo (either in the doc or in the code :)). The stomp 
documentation refers the custom header, for durable subscription, as 
"activemq.subscriptionName". In the java space, these  headers are 
parsed by class IntrospectionSupport (package org.apache.activemq.util), 
via class ConsumerInfo (package org.apache.activemq.command). The 
ConsumerInfo refers to the same header as: "subcriptionName".

  By setting the "activemq.subcriptionName" header in the SUBSCRIBE 
frame, Im able to create durable subscription. Otherwise the 
documentation (http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/stomp.html)  on the 
stomp custom header is correct.

- Sandeep
 
 Brian McCallister wrote:
> Hmm, I can look into this but won't have a good opportunity to until 
> after September 9 (a week and  half from now). If you dig into the 
> stomp transport stuff, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to put in, 
> but... that is a guesstimate.
>
> If it hasn't been done by Sept 9 I can dig through, but cannot promise 
> to before then :-(
>
> -Brian
>
> On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Sandeep Chayapathi wrote:
>
>> apologies for cross posting this. I think this is a bug and hence Im 
>> posting the same in the dev mailing list:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> This is regarding my last query
>> (http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=6040430&framed=y 
>> <http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=6040430&framed=y>). I was
>> grokking the source code, vis-a-vis Stomp and durable topic,  looks like
>> the documentation regarding the custom headers, is not in sync with the
>> source code,  i.e nohwere in the source code could I find a reference to
>> the following custom headers: activemq.subscriptionName and 
>> subscriberName.
>>
>> Any idea on how much effort is required to implement these ? I might be
>> wrong, it would help if anyone can point me in the right direction. 
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - Sandeep
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]