[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: Coding style, specifically 80 characters
From:       "Hiram Chirino" <hiram () hiramchirino ! com>
Date:       2006-08-29 13:24:03
Message-ID: af2843cd0608290624pa628bc7wfa121cadd0e8e163 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

+1 120 at LEAST.

On 8/25/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for 120 characters :)
>
> And Sun coding standards for the rest.
>
> On 8/25/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> > I try to keep the meat of the statement to the first 80 characters
> > and if some string goes out to say 200 characters, I don't really
> > care.  I just don't want to be surprised by some important thing off
> > the screen.
> >
> > -dain
> >
> > On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> >
> > > I generally do 120 as well :-)
> > >
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > > On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > >
> > >> Agreed.
> > >> 120 is much more useful :)
> > >>
> > >> On 8/24/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I think the 80 char limit is antiquated... now that most folks have
> > >>> displays that can quite easily display more than 80 columns.
> > >>> Limiting lines to 80 tends to force folks to artificially reformat
> > >>> code which just uglies things up.
> > >>>
> > >>> --jason
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Sepand M wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi guys,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Do you have a coding style that I should go by?
> > >>> > Specifically, do you use the 80 chars/line limit?
> > >>> > I see a lot of code that doesn't, so I haven't, but it's
> > >>> bugging me
> > >>> > more and more by the second.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Regards,
> > >>> > Sepand
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]