[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: activemq-dev
Subject: Re: Continuum Build Failure
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller () gmail ! com>
Date: 2006-07-31 13:05:55
Message-ID: 24C6AB3B-4C4D-4076-AFC8-FDFDCEC8E631 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Strange. Some other projects, also -- I didn't do it! ;-) Will have
a look later this morning.
--kevan
On Jul 31, 2006, at 4:55 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> BTW it looks like a new error has crept in...
>
> http://ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/
> ProjectBuild.vm?view=ProjectBuild&buildId=5623&id=4
>
> Error: JAVA_HOME is not defined correctly.
> We cannot execute java
>
>
> On 7/27/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:52 PM, James Strachan wrote:
>>
>> > On 7/27/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The ActiveMQ Core Build on GBuild's Continuum (http://
>> ci.gbuild.org/
>> >> continuum/target/) has been failing since July 7th. See http://
>> >> ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm?
>> >> view=ProjectBuild&buildId=5212&id=4 for the specific failures.
>> >
>> > FWIW am not sure why the failures are not making the SCM list.
>>
>> Good point. I'd wondered about that... I don't think any email
>> notifications are getting out for any project. I don't recall seeing
>> any Geronimo notifications for a while. Must be some configuration
>> problem.
>>
>> >
>> >> Are these tests failing for everyone? Or is there an environmental
>> >> problem on GBuild?
>> >
>> > They are not failing for me at least - it could be environmental.
>> > After some grepping I've found the tests that are failing (wish CI
>> > would tell you that easily :)
>> >
>> > org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest
>> >
>> org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoMulticastDiscoveryBrokerTopicSendRece
>> i
>> > veTest
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest
>> >
>> > It could be something to do with multicast support as all these
>> tests
>> > are using multicast.
>> > --
>> >
>> > James
>> > -------
>> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
>> Probably right. Any hints on likely causes of multicast problems? In
>> case it's useful, here are the Surefire reports:
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------
>> Test set: org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------
>> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 42.211 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testTopicAllConnected
>> (org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest) Time
>> elapsed: 26.172 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<60> but was:<30>
>> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:207)
>> at
>> org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest.testTopicAl
>> lCo
>> nnected(MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest.java:68)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------
>> Test set:
>> org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoMulticastDiscoveryBrokerTopicSendRece
>> ive
>> Test
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 70.757 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testSendReceive
>> (org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoMulticastDiscoveryBrokerTopicSendRec
>> eiv
>> eTest) Time elapsed: 70.729 sec <<< FAIL\URE!
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Not enough messages received
>> expected:<100> but was:<0>
>> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>> at
>> org.apache.activemq.test.JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.assertMessagesRece
>> ive
>> dAreValid(JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.java:169)
>> at
>> org.apache.activemq.test.JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.assertMessagesAreR
>> ece
>> ived(JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.java:149)
>> at
>> org.apache.activemq.test.JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.testSendReceive
>> (JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.java:123)
>> ...
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------
>> Test set: org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 33.752 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testSendReceive(org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest) Time
>> elapsed: 33.723 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected message count not
>> correct expected:<450> but was:<150>
>> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>> at
>> org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest.testSendReceive
>> (TopicClusterTest.java:176)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic