[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: Continuum Build Failure
From:       Kevan Miller <kevan.miller () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-07-31 13:05:55
Message-ID: 24C6AB3B-4C4D-4076-AFC8-FDFDCEC8E631 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Strange. Some other projects, also --  I didn't do it! ;-) Will have  
a look later this morning.
--kevan
On Jul 31, 2006, at 4:55 AM, James Strachan wrote:

> BTW it looks like a new error has crept in...
>
> http://ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ 
> ProjectBuild.vm?view=ProjectBuild&buildId=5623&id=4
>
> Error: JAVA_HOME is not defined correctly.
>  We cannot execute java
>
>
> On 7/27/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:52 PM, James Strachan wrote:
>>
>> > On 7/27/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The ActiveMQ Core Build on GBuild's Continuum (http:// 
>> ci.gbuild.org/
>> >> continuum/target/) has been failing since July 7th.  See http://
>> >> ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm?
>> >> view=ProjectBuild&buildId=5212&id=4 for the specific failures.
>> >
>> > FWIW am not sure why the failures are not making the SCM list.
>>
>> Good point. I'd wondered about that... I don't think any email
>> notifications are getting out for any project. I don't recall seeing
>> any Geronimo notifications for a while. Must be some configuration
>> problem.
>>
>> >
>> >> Are these tests failing for everyone? Or is there an environmental
>> >> problem on GBuild?
>> >
>> > They are not failing for me at least - it could be environmental.
>> > After some grepping I've found the tests that are failing (wish CI
>> > would tell you that easily :)
>> >
>> > org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest
>> >  
>> org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoMulticastDiscoveryBrokerTopicSendRece 
>> i
>> > veTest
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest
>> >
>> > It could be something to do with multicast support as all these  
>> tests
>> > are using multicast.
>> > --
>> >
>> > James
>> > -------
>> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
>> Probably right. Any hints on likely causes of multicast problems? In
>> case it's useful, here are the Surefire reports:
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> Test set: org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 42.211 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testTopicAllConnected
>> (org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest)  Time
>> elapsed: 26.172 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<60> but was:<30>
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:207)
>>          at
>> org.apache.activemq.usecases.MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest.testTopicAl 
>> lCo
>> nnected(MultiBrokersMultiClientsTest.java:68)
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> Test set:
>> org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoMulticastDiscoveryBrokerTopicSendRece 
>> ive
>> Test
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 70.757 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testSendReceive
>> (org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoMulticastDiscoveryBrokerTopicSendRec 
>> eiv
>> eTest)  Time elapsed: 70.729 sec  <<< FAIL\URE!
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Not enough messages received
>> expected:<100> but was:<0>
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>>          at
>> org.apache.activemq.test.JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.assertMessagesRece 
>> ive
>> dAreValid(JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.java:169)
>>          at
>> org.apache.activemq.test.JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.assertMessagesAreR 
>> ece
>> ived(JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.java:149)
>>          at
>> org.apache.activemq.test.JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.testSendReceive
>> (JmsSendReceiveTestSupport.java:123)
>>         ...
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> Test set: org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 33.752 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testSendReceive(org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest)  Time
>> elapsed: 33.723 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected message count not
>> correct expected:<450> but was:<150>
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>>          at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>>          at
>> org.apache.activemq.transport.TopicClusterTest.testSendReceive
>> (TopicClusterTest.java:176)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic