[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       9fans
Subject:    Re: [9fans] 9p resource sharing [was: Scanners]
From:       Jorden Mauro <jrm8005 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-11-28 19:17:37
Message-ID: 3aaafc130911281117p2727a5ddv2c7f9756ae03dd9e () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis
<eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> On 28 Nov 2009, at 2:28 pm, hiro wrote:
>
>> It's also very easy to run my toaster diskless. Does this say anything
>> about it's elegance or simplicity? I don't remember what my toaster
>> has to do with 9p, but nevermind.
>
> And somebody always mentions toasters! Or coffee machines... :D
>
> Actually, yes it does say a lot about a toaster's elegant simplicity: a
> toaster only has parts to do the job intended. At a minimum a switched
> heater, a sprung sliding bread carrier which also switches the heater, and a
> thermally-releasing latch for the slider. I have seen a toaster without even
> that much complexity; it had glass sides so you could see when your toast
> was done how you like it.

There is a toaster that burns a picture of a raincloud, sun,
snowflake, etc. depending
on the morning's forecast. There is also a coffee pot you can control
via ethernet.

The coffee pot runs windows and there is a virus that causes Coffee
Denial of Service
on it.

>
> Actually there is a link here. Things to share are increasingly bloated, and
> applications strangely seem to need access to every feature of the shared
> entity. 9p could perhaps help by presenting a device model with files for
> different capabilities, or something like that, but it is only half a
> solution. OTOH perhaps the need to access device features is not really
> strange. Requiring a whole postscript interpreter on your printer could be
> seen as just as strange, it was certainly very expensive to do a few years
> ago.
>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
>> <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 Nov 2009, at 8:53 pm, ron minnich wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> it is pretty hard to run windows, osx or linux without
>>>>> a hard drive.
>>>>
>>>> linux is actually quite easy and has been for about 12 years or more
>>>> ... not sure of the others.
>>>
>>> It's certainly possible to run OS X diskless, and knowing Apple it'll
>>> take
>>> less setting up than Linux. ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]