[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       9fans
Subject:    Re: [9fans] floatfmt on 64-bit targets?
From:       C H Forsyth <forsyth () vitanuova ! com>
Date:       2005-10-26 10:25:30
Message-ID: 788ac2c09f34fc1a4ce43b2316581314 () vitanuova ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

was that on Plan 9 or plan 9 ports (and if so, which platform)?

Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by doppio;
	Tue Oct 25 21:58:23 GMT 2005
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B4FED63C3E
	for <forsyth@vitanuova.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:59:28 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id EDF7C6361D
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:59:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 07715-01-70 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>;
	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from holo.morphisms.net (holo.morphisms.net [66.93.84.55])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 919E2635E3
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mero.morphisms.net (mero.morphisms.net [66.93.84.246])
	by holo.morphisms.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5FF24FA9
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mero.morphisms.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A65D433; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:38 -0400
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <20051025215838.GA3159@mero.morphisms.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-No-archive: yes
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] floatfmt on 64-bit targets?
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/9fans>,
	<mailto:9fans-request@cse.psu.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans>
List-Post: <mailto:9fans@cse.psu.edu>
List-Help: <mailto:9fans-request@cse.psu.edu?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/9fans>,
	<mailto:9fans-request@cse.psu.edu?subject=subscribe>
Sender: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=vitanuova.com@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=vitanuova.com@cse.psu.edu

Has anyone run into problems with %f on 64-bit targets?
With large numbers passed in to %f, it appears xdtoa
overruns s in floatfmt. Has anyone already fixed this?

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]