[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       9fans
Subject:    Re: Samterm panic (was Re: [9fans] sam vs acme)
From:       "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn () null ! net>
Date:       2001-07-20 8:54:32
Message-ID: 3B57454D.69E9F9E4 () null ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

suspect@spy.suspicious.org wrote:
> samterm:panic: count>DATASIZE: Success

If I recall correctly, the last time I encountered this
was using a 630 on UNIX, and it turned out to be due to
the tty handler being switched back to cooked mode before
the sam front end had consumed all the data from the
final packet.  I changed the protocol to include one
extra handshake before both halves terminated.  If the
current "sam" is susceptible to this, I'd suggest the
same cure.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]